Hawking Up Hairballs

Tuesday, September 12, 2006

Gregory Perelman

The New Yorker recently published an article about the Poincare Conjecture. This is a mathematical problem that has finally been solved after about a hundred years. Gregory Perelman is the man who accomplished that feat, and the The New Yorker article is about the tempest in the academic tea pot that his solution caused. I encourage everyone to read the article for the full story. (I’ve included the link at the bottom of this entry.) However, for those of you who aren’t so inclined, I’ll talk a little about Perelman and the conjecture.

In its essence, the Poincare Conjecture is easy to understand. In the field of mathematics called topology, shapes can be classified according to how many holes they have in them. On the basis of this scheme, a space in the shape of a doughnut, called a torus, is in a different classification from a sphere, because the torus has a single hole in it, while a sphere has none.

What are called continuous transformations can be applied to the spaces in topology. These are changes to the space that do not involve tearing the surface of the space. For example, a sphere can be transformed into something with the shape of a football. No problem there, but spaces with different classifications cannot be transformed into one another using a continuous transformation. You can see this for yourself. Make a ball of clay, then try to reshape that ball into a doughnut without breaking the surface of the clay. It can’t be done.

The Poincare Conjecture states that any space with no hole in it can be reshaped into a sphere using a continuous transformation. This seems obvious when one thinks about it, but it is not unusual for a mathematical conjecture to appear obvious, even to non-professionals, while being exceedingly difficult to prove. Many brilliant and accomplished mathematicians have had a go at the Poincare Conjecture, and it was finally proved for all spaces but three-dimensional spaces. However, these are the most important kind, especially to physicists, because the space that we know and live in is described using three dimensions. That’s why it was such a big deal when Perelman proved the conjecture for the three-dimensional case.

In many ways, Gregory Perelman is the stereotypical, eccentric mathematical genius. In 1992, he spent a semester at NYU. During his time there, he wore the same brown corduroy jacket every day. He claimed to live on nothing but bread, milk, and cheese. His fingernails were several inches long because he saw no reason to cut them. At age twenty-nine, in the mid-nineties, he returned to Russia to live as a recluse with his mother.

Odd enough, for sure, but it wasn’t mere eccentricity that led Perelman to become a recluse, It was professional politics. The mathematics profession is subject to the same sort of political machinations that are to be found in all academic disciplines. Many of the best mathematicians have enormous egos, and are much concerned over getting credit for their discoveries. Perelman apparently thought that they cared about their careers more than the mathematics, so he left the profession. As he vehemently states in the New Yorker piece, he’s not a politician, and obviously has no intention of playing at being one. Good for him!

It is for that reason that Perelman has become the first man to decline the Fields Medal. The Fields is the equivalent of the Nobel Prize in the field of mathematics. It is given out every four years, usually to three or four people. The winners of the Fields Medal invariably become figureheads for the profession, and that is evidently the last thing that Perelman wants. That’s why he turned it down, and it seems that there’s a question of integrity involved on Perelman’s part because he has also refused another prize of one million dollars to the first person to prove the Poincare Conjecture.

Characters like Perelman intrigue me. I was a bright kid, and scored in the low genius range on IQ tests and such. However, I was by no means a prodigy, though I certainly envied them. It seemed that the whole world of the intellect was open to them, and that’s what I wanted. It was only much later, when I was an adult that I realized what it really was about prodigies that I envied. The life of the mind is the only thing that truly matters to me and to be a genius like Perelman, or Einstein meant to be a demigod. And why not, if Plato is to be credited, and knowledge is virtue?

I was browsing some science blogs last week, and ended up on the blog of a math professor at James Madison University. He was talking about Perelman’s accomplishment, and pointed out that to most math professors it’s another world. As he said, to address the big, open problems requires a monkish devotion, and the relevant mathematics is only to be found in difficult articles in the journals, many of them hundreds of pages long, which leaves out most mathematicians. As this professor said, he stood no chance of understanding what Perelman was doing.

I’d love to write a novel about a character like Perelman, but I wouldn’t know how to go about it. How do you create an interesting book about someone who lives so completely in the mind? It would indeed be like trying to write a novel about a contemplative monk, a task that is well beyond my powers.

http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/060828fa_fact2

4 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

wasn't a film like that already done, starring russell crow?

12:35 AM  
Blogger Chuck Oliveros said...

The movie you're referring to is A Beautiful Mind,. It was based on the life of the mathematician/economist John Nash, who was actually mad, as in schizophrenia, and the story is about how he overcame his madness. Perelman is decidedly not mad. He's just eccentric.

2:32 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Leave Britney alone!

12:48 PM  
Blogger HarmonicSeriesful said...

ŽžŠšĐđĆćČč
ȗȔúÙùŌōȎȏȌȍÓóÒòĪīȊȋȈȉÍíÌìĒēȆȇȄȅÉéÈèĀāȂȃȀȁÁáÀà
ȒȓȐȑŔŕ
ÒÒÒÓÓÓȌȌȌȎȎȎŌŌŌÙÙÙÚÚÚȔȔȔȖȖȖŪŪŪÀÀÀÁÁÁȀȀȀȂȂȂĀĀĀÈÈÈÉÉÉȄȄȄȆȆȆĒĒĒàáȁȃāèéȅȇē
Smallest permulation Croatian Croatti town is very beautiful no many what's appeared think now buffer Croatti kit.,
Nomall large halfty size Croatti system logic logi croatti log ic cut word listzed ripping incoming.,
inverse verse pemutation number Capture size.,Def infinite Proof on Server Sotec.,co.,ltd.,But Sorry Indust.,
Croatti Banzai!!
Proof authentication Croatia Mathematics Society.,MAC 999999999.,00000000HA.,
Comment in Cate to K ate atemp license figure this in CCC ripping KKK symmetry buffer input two point ripped in outside time space travel ingin over dance Creatures.,Hero four CK Cashes Kashed KC dejective Proof.,sing in CMS.,Croatia.,
Proof authentication MAC880088000000888888.,.,.,.,.,.,
Kenichi Mori UGM/S/OpenWall.,inc/openwall.com/CCC.,Inc/ccc.de/Microsoft.,co.,ltd.,/President.,/
放送大学研究所所長及び学長
071ー035570−0
indexharmony@gmail.com:happyharmonic@yahoo.com:
Vulnerability-lab@morikenichi.com:
Berarussia@Berarussia.edu:admin Mori Kenichi Sir .,Dr.,math.,
Seven comment SC commentary proof., law minus all word input output system.,
help all law number of juthic attack unbith corrupt attemption asterisk symbol.,
Systac coming my area in paper fomula service step up Christian Service Called.,
Commentary wordlist induction wordlist Super nanoment Size micro countdown.,
Buffer control wing noid size settle.,Mind Roots.,ID 071-035570-0
Comment inputed Proof Croatian mathematician Authentication ID 081-033300-5
Perelman is Sir Dr of Prof., 1029.,West and Ease Countrer.,
Observer annouce Openwall.,Inc Solar Designer., Alexander Pestrosov.,
Geometric maxtrics rematrix confusion extraction equal wordlist equal all word.,
Proof Wordlist fashion theory in Bible Matthew 41:23: .,Thanks

6:49 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home